Fixing of Gas prices by government of India and then increasing it
to double in favour of Reliance Industry creates real and genuine doubts in the
minds of everyone who are little bit aware of system and procedure, who are
well acquainted with pricing based on market trends and who knows the way
politicians makes money for them and for their party through such concessions
and such liberty to corporate..It is however not new in Indian politics.
Even during the tenure of Indira Gandhi, may tax concessions and
rise in tax rates used to be decided in consultation with Dhirubhai Ambani and
big corporate houses that used to help Congress Party in raising political
fund.
National level parties or Regional parties who spend hundreds of
crores of rupees in election to ensure victory of their candidates manage fund
only from rich business houses. Local level leaders manage some funds from
local rich business persons by using soft or coercive tactics.
And it is bitter truth that majority of good business persons
who have to run their business without any hindrance, use to extend financial
help to all political parties.
And as long as there is fear of torture and goondaism from
powerful politicians and powerful administrative officials , business men will
continue to donate liberally to politicians and in lieu of that politicians who
are in power will continue to sacrifice the interest of the
country and the interest of common men.
Therefore I salute Sri Arvind Kejriwal and his team, Ramdeo and
his team and Team Anna Hazare who are fighting against the cancer of corruption
which is slowly killing all system and which is cause of all painful stories of
common men.
Success of their efforts will surely depend upon the cooperation
they get from common men.
There is no doubt that political leaders of Congress
Party who have accumulated huge illegal wealth by doing
politics only for years and decades will try their best to put hurdles in
the path of Kejriwal in running government in Delhi and they will leave no
stone unturned to malign the image of Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and his party AAP.
I am unable to understand why and how BJP is also singing the same
tune which leaders of Congress Party are singing. I am sure that top leaders
will continue to keep silence on the way Kejriwal is working for few months and
then assess the performance .Before that if they join hands with Congress Party
in throwing out Kejriwal government in Delhi, voters will not excuse them too
in next election.
Last but not the least, There is no doubt that the key reasons
behind price rises of fuel or any other essential commodities in India is only
rampant corruption and unbridled freedom given by Congress Party led UPA
government to corporate in the name of reformation but actually for vested
interest of ruling Congress Party.
I agree however that by openly abusing and accusing corporate houses
of theft and loot without proving it legally, Arvind Kejriwal will adversely
affect the business environment. I agree that such type of witch hunting is not
conducive for healthy growth of industries and other businesses.
But it is also true that when exploitation by rich reach beyond
tolerance and when life becomes miserable for common men, the revolution like
that of Arvind Kejriwal is inevitable.
I however hope that by passage of time Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and his
team will learn the way government is run smoothly and tactfully without
sacrificing the ideals and goals set by the party.
If Arvind Kejriwal is making strong allegations against how gas prices are being fixed, and how Reliance may be benefitting at the cost of the economy, the UPA government has largely itself to blame. In announcing a dubious way of fixing gas prices last year, the government made itself vulnerable to such charges. As we noted in Firstpost last year, there was no tearing hurry to announce a decision for 2014 back then, when a government may change, and the entire global energy scenario may be different.
Not only has the UPA tied down the next government to a seriously flawed decision, but its motives in doing so are also suspect. Real reform is what the US did with shale gas, which is to free exploration and domestic pricing. You don't fix prices through a government and call it reform. If you fix prices, instead of letting the market determine the price, you are likely to be accused of collusion with businessmen. You have handed a propaganda coup to Kejriwal - whose remedies are unlikely to help reduce energy prices either.
Among the follies announced last year were the decision to fix KG gas prices at around $8 per mmBtu based on a complex formula. There is no reason why pricing should be announced in dollars. Remember the criticism of the Enron deal? Why price power in dollars when the revenues are all in rupee? The same logic should apply to the Indian gas pricing scene.
Among the follies announced last year were the decision to fix KG gas prices at around $8 per mmBtu based on a complex formula. There is no reason why pricing should be announced in dollars. Remember the criticism of the Enron deal? Why price power in dollars when the revenues are all in rupee? The same logic should apply to the Indian gas pricing scene.
Why should the Indian consumer, and possibly the taxpayer, take on the exchange risk of India-produced gas? Moreover, how can a committee - or bureaucrat-decided price - be called reform? Do bureaucrats know better than the market? If the logic for allowing a price increase is that import prices are higher currently, one wonders what would happen if global prices crash?
The only move that can be called reform is market-based pricing - where businesses take both the risks and rewards of global and domestic price movements. The pricing decision announced last June, and especially the explanation given by Finance Minister P Chidambaram, involved gas output prices and not input prices for user industries - which meant the government had decided how much money gas producers, ONGC and Reliance among them, will make, but not how much gas users (power, fertiliser consumers) should pay. This is utter stupidity.
Chidambaram said: "At the moment we are fixing only output prices, the price payable to gas producers. This will indeed have an impact on the consumer, but those prices are not being fixed today.....What is the price at which it should be supplied to a power plant, to a fertiliser plant, in order to make power affordable, fertiliser affordable... that can still be decided between now and April 1 (2014)." This begs the question: if input prices for power and fertiliser can be decided later, why rush to decide output prices nearly a year in advance? When the two are inter-linked, it's like trying to have your cake today, and leaving the job of cleaning up the mess to someone else in 2014.
Then, any fixing of input at a lower price than output price will mean a bloating of subsidies. Who will pay this? The taxpayer, or somebody else?
In the case of oil subsidies, both taxpayers and public sector oil companies have carried the can for the government's political decisions. Will the same happen with gas now? Will ONGC and GAIL bear the subsidies?
This would be a disaster, and a clear case of misgovernance. ONGC shareholders should be suing the government if that happens. The UPA's intentions appear suspect and mala fide - and it didn't need a Kejriwal to tell us this.
If the benefits of a gas price hike are to be had upfront and the costs will be shifted to the next government (which will have to take the painful decision of bearing more subsidies, or reducing the gas price at the output end), this is clearly a scorched-earth policy.
The UPA has essentially lobbed a ticking time-bomb to the next government. It appears that the gas price announcement was intended to achieve two non-reform goals of the UPA: given the drastic fall in the rupee, the government needed the market to perk up in order to reverse capital outflows last year; it also needed a buoyant stock market to meet its fiscal deficit target. These targets can be met only if public sector shares can be sold to investors.
In June, foreign institutional investors sold equity and debt to the tune of over Rs 40,000 crore. The gas price announcement temporarily reversed that trend. But reform cannot be about meeting these kinds of goals. Or pandering to FIIs.
Even if gas pricing is intended to induce new investments in petrocarbon exploration, it cannot be done in isolation. The energy sector comprises oil, gas, coal, coal-bed methane and shale gas, too. If you want to reform the sector, you have to reform pricing in all of them, not just gas. By raising gas prices, and leaving other prices and sectors as they are, the government is clearly worsening its energy sector problems.
The only way to reform is to let prices of fuels find their own levels, so that businesses can make a rational decision on which fuel to use for what kind of output. The doubling of gas prices is widely seen as a favour to gas producers.
It may well be that, but in the long-term, it will actually damage the gas sector. When you double prices by fiat, the chances are that gas users will go into losses; they will have to be rescued either by the taxpayer or banks. And future demand for gas-based fertiliser and power plants will be curbed. Who will the gas producers sell to then?
In the US, when the government decided to boost shale gas production, it did not set any price. The market did that. This brought in new investment, and competition - and today natural gas prices at the US's Henry Hub are below $4 per mmBtu. And here we are, trying to double that price and calling it reform. It is difficult to believe that the UPA's gas price move was at all intended to reform anything beyond putting out the fire in the economy's backyard - where the rupee was clearly going down in flames last June. Real reform is what the US did with shale gas.And we didn't need Kejriwal - an anti-market rabble-rouser - to remind us of this.
http://www.firstpost.com/india/upa-and-gas-price-fixing-sadly-kejriwal-is-saying-nothing-new-1383931.html
http://www.firstpost.com/india/upa-and-gas-price-fixing-sadly-kejriwal-is-saying-nothing-new-1383931.html
Delhi government directs Anti-Corruption branch to register FIR against Mukesh Ambani, Murali Deora, Veerappa Moily & VK Sibal
Delhi government on Tuesday (February 11, 2014) directed the Anti-Corruption Branch to register an FIR against the chairperson of Reliance Industries Limited Mukesh Ambani, union petroleum minister M Veerappa Moily, former petroleum minister Murli Deora and former director general of Hydrocarbons VK Sibal under various sections of the Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA).
Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal described the details mentioned in the complaint received by the Delhi government as shocking, and which were an assault on India’s economic sovereignty and amounted to an anti-national activity.
The CM has demanded that the central government should put its decision to hike the prices of gas in abeyance till the time the probe into the matter is completed.
No comments:
Post a Comment