Why Does Kejriwal Want Modi to Be Defeated

There are several prominent ,reputed and popular political leaders of various political parties in India who have reportedly performed better when elected to power. Some are good in the eyes of some people and some are bad in the eyes of some other people. None of them are not so good that every men of their area like. Even the best persons have opponents. Even Arvind Kejriwal cannot claim to be a person who is liked by one and all.

I submit hereunder name of some of these popular figures:--

1. Sonia Gandhi
2. Rahul Gandhi
3. Kapil sibbal
4. P Chidambram
5. L K Advani
6. Narendra Modi
7. Sushma Swaraj
8. Arun Jaitley
9. Rajnath Singh
10. Mulayam singh Yadav
11. Akhilesh Pd Yadav
12. Nitish KumaR
13. Lalu Prasad Yadav
14. Naveen Patnaik
15. Mamta banerjee
16. Mayawati
17. Jayalalitha
18. Karunanidhi
19. Farooq Abdullah
20. Shivraj Singh chouhan
21. Raman Singh
22. Manohar Parikar
23. Prakash Karat
24. Prakash singh Badal
25. Arvind Kejriwal
26. Manish Sisodia
27. Kumar Biswas

    And so on..........

I request Mr. Arvind Kejriwal and his supporters to assess and ascertain ability and capacity of above named and other popular figures of various parties to decide whether they have potential to lead this country. He may give them marks  from various angles and come to conclusion only after giving them a balanced consideration and balanced ,practical and pragmatic approach . They should assess whether these people are performing in their command area and if performing who are those who get more than 60 marks out of 100.If some of them have not performed in the past but they can perform better if given fresh opportunity, then also marks can be given.

Similarly AK and AAP should assess and ascertain the ability of their candidates honestly and find out the names who are able to get  more than 60 marks applying same criteria and same parameters as applied for others.

Lastly I request AK. AAP and all who want progress of the country and who want improvement in living standard of common men to ensure  entry of all persons in Parliament irrespective of their party affiliation. Only good people can ensure justice to common men and not a few of any particular party. None of political entity including even AAP is ideally full of best stalwarts and best performers. Similarly none of prominent and popular leaders named above can say honestly that they are loved by all Indians uniformly and without any doubt.

Bitter truth is that none of political party (other than BJP) can be expected to get absolute majority in 2014 Parliament. In such critical situation, all leaders have to ponder over how to form government keeping in view all conflicts and past controversies. 

Delhi state government can be kept in suspended animation after the resignation of Arvind Kejriwal but Indian Parliament cannot be kept in suspended animation and hence even if none of parties get absolute majority , it is necessary to form the government at center to keep India safe and progressive, economically, politically and socially.

As such it is desirable that all good among the worst are elected and sent to Parliament and all should learn to respect the views of others. Democracy also suggests debate and discussion for arriving at best possible solution for any particular problem.

Arvind Kejriwal is planning to fight against Narendra Modi in Varanasi or Kumar Biswas is planning to fight against Rahul Gandhi. How far the idea of Arvind Kejriwal is good and how far it is bad , I do not want to say. But I definitely would like to say that If Kejriwal and Modi both are good and better than many others , both of them should be elected. Similarly if Biswas and Rahul both are good, both should be elected to power.

Arvind Kejriwal had promised and planned to give ticket to that person only who have been unanimously picked up by people of that very constituency and who is the best available option in that particular constituency. But unfortunately Arvind has also become victim of power politics of other parties and he has also started deciding allocation of tickets for election sitting in his personal or office room and has started taking decision on the basis of advice of a pool of four or five persons. He has also started exporting and importing candidates to and from other areas keeping in view winnability and financial capacity of aspiring candidate as old parties have been traditionally doing.

I am unable to understand how a person of Amritsar can serve in Ranchi in best way or a person of Delhi can serve in Amethi or a person of Gaziabad can serve in Varanasi. 

Unfortunately ,Political parties in general are acting as if they have to win IPL match by hook or by crook and then loot the country sacrificing the interest of common men and the country as a whole. Politicians in general are opting for politics not to serve the area people but only to earn money. It is very much unfortunate that they do not care future of India and do they like to serve people.

People of India had large expectation from newly borne AAP but it is painful that they are running from pillar to past to eliminate persons of other parties irrespective of whether the person is good or bad.

I once again request Mr. Arvind kejriwal not to make an environment of negativity and do not stop and do not disturb all good persons in performing. 

After all we have to choose figure among ciphers. Arvind Kejriwal cannot bring ideally honest and best performers from Mars or any other planet.

Arvind Kejriwal says that Mr. Narendra Modi has done nothing for Gujarat and progress and growth claimed to have taken place in Gujarat by media men or by BJP supporters is totally false. He says that media men are willfully not exposing Modi to serve their vested interest. He says that Raman has done nothing in Chhatishgarh, Shiela Dixit has done nothing in Delhi or Nitish Kumar has done nothing in Bihar. He does not like Mamta, Mayawati or Jayalalitha . May be he is true.

But he should name at least names of a few states where the government has done some good work. He should name persons who have served better in their constituencies.

If Arvind learn to praise good persons he will get success in creating a positive environment. 

He should also keep in mind the difficulties in running a government in Delhi which forced him to resign. He should keep in mind how his own supporters became his rivals. He should keep in mind how people are fighting against each other in quest of a party ticket. He must apply his short tenure experience to make better future of the country and better future of people of India. He cannot claim to be 100 percent best for his men and cannot expect that his men (AAP men) will only perform and others will not.

I hope Mr. Arvind Kejriwal ponder over my views expressed above and try to change himself to change India. I do not hesitate in saying that India has already suffered a lot due to negativity of media men and that of AAP and there is no doubt that prolonged negativity will further damage India's financials.

Corruption is dangerous and concern for corruption is equally dangerous and harmful for health of common men and the country. Action against corrupt is necessary but only to threaten action against all every time has adversely affected the work culture and sharply dampened the confidence of Foreign Investors as well as that of domestic investors. Willingly or unwillingly ,Growth has become victim of fight against corruption and I hope Arvind will learn lesson from deteriorating economic condition of the country.